Reflections on Proposal 63: Recommendations for ongoing stewardship of Hub governance

Introduction Throughout the past six months, Hypha Worker Co-operative has been involved in the drafting, deliberation, and promotion of 6 out of 13 proposals ( #65 , #66 , #69 , #72 , #74 , #75 ). Of those 13 proposals, 9 have had discussion posts on the forum. We have participated in numerous public and private calls and conversations about the state of governance on the Hub and paid close attention to how deliberation and decision-making is taking shape in our network. In our previous post , we reported on our deliverables and projects following Proposal 63: Activate governance discussions on the Discourse forum using community pool funds . Here, we present our observations, recommendations, and vision for the ongoing stewardship of governance on the Hub. What should the Hub’s governance stewards care about? While governance on the Hub feels smoother than before, we observe a few persistent themes that will remain important for ongoing stewardship. These issues are deep, widespread, and constantly evolving – hence the need for conscious ongoing work to address them. In six months we were able to make significant progress but everything in the ecosystem evolves at a…

Excerpt (1194 of 16581 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

Thanks for this Lexa and team. We fully support everything you’ve just put forward and would vote yes on funding it.

I also fully support this initiative. The analysis of current hub governance is apt, the problems are expressed clearly and (I believe) accurately. Additionally the categorization of stewardship work is well-stated. While we still have a long way to go establishing healthy governance practice and culture, y’alls work with the hub has been a huge step in the right direction, and it is encouraging to see a conversation which further expands this effort. When it comes time to write the proposal itself, it may be useful to further clarify the ask, particularly in regards to authorities and responsibilities of the members of the Hub Governance DAO (apologies! just realized that this is only meant as reflections on Proposal 68, and isn’t intended as a proposal quite yet, nevertheless). Perhaps this is a bit of a chicken and egg problem since we still lack an overall template for the ratification of working groups and councils. All the same, this may be an excellent opportunity to create such a template. I feel fairly confident that you were already thinking along the same lines, as stated here: lexa: The internal governance practices of this DAO could also serve as a…

Excerpt (1194 of 7802 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

Great one, we support this!

lexa:

The Hub Governance DAO.

Hello @lexa can community also form DAOs on Cosmos Chain in the future?
If yes then let me know the How ??