Censure of Interchain Foundation for harming competitive marketplace for validation

This governance proposal seeks to censure, formally notify via governance, the interchain foundation that they are making the Cosmos hub weaker by delegating to validators who do not participate in governance, do not contribute to the community or to software development, and have abysmal uptime. Governance cannot modify the policies of any token holder, but governance most certainly can pass a censure text proposal. Here is some information about the ICF delegations, most notable among these is the random string. Notion The AI workspace that works for you. | Notion A tool that connects everyday work into one space. It gives you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one, flexible workspace. Change log • YYYY-MM-DD Created initial post Summary Details Forum post link IPFS link Governance votes The following items summarize the voting options and what it means for this proposal: YES - vote yes to censure the interchange foundation for harming the competitive marketplace in validation on the cosmos hub and pursuing ICS in bad faith because they have been made aware that they make…

Excerpt (1190 of 1733 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

This is very easy to resolve without a gov prop to censure the icf, but all attempts by myself and others have failed.

The random string validator and numerous other icf delegates are harmful to Gaia, and that’s the bottom line.

Interchain Explorer by Cosmostation

Interchain block explorer and data analytics for sovereign blockchain networks.