Suggested tagging and naming conventions for proposals

Conventions Title conventions help people see proposal progress at-a-glance in the forum. URL’s to forum posts are generated using a combination of the title slug and the post’s numerical ID. They ought to continue working even as the title is edited as long as the link contains the ID number. In addition to naming conventions, please make use of the tags for proposal stages as well. These tags mirror the naming convention and are easier to use as filters and for external tooling to parse. Use this naming convention for the top-level post in the thread. [Proposal ##][STAGE] {Title of proposal} • Until a proposal moves on-chain it won’t have a ##. That’s fine! Just use [Proposal] until you’re on-chain • Proposals go through several stages throughout their life. The author of the top-level post is responsible for keeping the title up-to-date with where the proposal is. • The title should be something that clearly communicates what you hope to accomplish. Proposal stages • DRAFT: A period to engage in discussion and respond to feedback and review from core stakeholders and community members. • LAST CALL yyyy-mm-dd: Serves as a clear notification that the…

Excerpt (1192 of 2349 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

Nice Information @lexa definitely it will help others

It is an important suggestion if you want to keep the space well structured and easy to monitor props’ progress

Great ideas, always good to have named structures in-place.

This is a very helpful suggestion for keeping proposals organized.

LAST CALL tag is underrated gives the community a clear heads-up before things go on-chain.

How strictly should authors follow these title conventions, especially if a proposal evolves significantly during discussion?

How strictly should authors follow the title conventions for proposals are minor deviations allowed if the meaning is clear?