[PROPOSAL][ABANDONED] Input reasons for the votes in the ‘memo’

One of the vital yet easily overlooked aspects of governance is not on action of voting yes/no but the discussion of why members chose to vote so. Although discussions on forums and other channels precede the votes, they may not reflect the official position while voting. As of now, each validator can declare one’s official position on twitter, telegram, etc. but such information is not readily accessible for all community members. Furthermore, it is difficult for the proposer to determine the impact of each stance(of each validator’s staking power) on the votes. Therefore, I propose that each vote tx should include the reason for the yes/no in the ‘memo’. The collected memos should be provided to the proposer, who would be informed how many of the votes(and staking power) were opposed to which aspect of the proposal. If in case the proposer finds that the reasons behind rejection can be addressed or modified, and by checking the staking power of each reason, he or she would be able to resubmit the amended proposal. Since a voter may agree to most of the suggestions on a proposal but not on the rest, and may vote for the proposal if the latter is modified, the collection of…

Excerpt (1194 of 1789 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗