Skip to content
Cosmopediaby Unity Nodes
DiscussionsValidationAllowing "small" validatorsForum ↗

Allowing "small" validators

Validation1 posts490 views3 likesLast activity Feb 2020
NJ
njmurarkaOP
Feb 2020 3

I have a more general question that might be obvious to most people. I see that the major Cosmos chains have validators who are each “big” players. These validators have invested significantly into their infrastructure, and these are run much like a business. I can understand why, with the risk of slashing and the competitiveness to get delegator commissions. But in general, what are the reasons why a Cosmos chain could not have even “smaller basement” operations to also run validators? It seems to be more decentralized to do this, than to have only say 10 or 20 major players (which sounds alot more like DPoS). I heard that there are performance considerations why you would not want 10,000 validators, but what if you had say 50 big ones and 150 smaller ones? These smaller guys would still need to ensure they stay up and running and be available while they are part of the validator set, of course, to avoid slashing. But is the overlying assumption here that only one of these “bigger” validators has the infrastructure to provide this required uptime and availability? As a very contrived example, what if these smaller guys could come on as a validator for 8 hrs in a day while…

Excerpt (1199 of 1594 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

← Back to Discussions