Our explanation for voting "no" to proposal GWG #23

fuckgoogle has voted `No` to Proposal 23 of Cosmos Hub We have voted `No` to proposal #23 on Cosmos Hub . We believe that a correctly set out GWG will be of huge importance to the Cosmos ecosystem and respect Gavin of Figment Network to be able to champion the group. We took participation in the first GWG call, and think that the idea is more than positive for the whole ecosystem. You may see our feedback to the call on the Cosmos forum . The reason we decided to vote `No` is more about the community pool itself and our view on its current use. We believe that the community pool should be used for the sake of the community. This does not mean that we think that governance isn’t important. However, at this point and time, we fully agree with Kwun of Forbole that the community pool must first be used to those who need it most. At this point, the idea of the GWG is raw and still needs polishing. Nonetheless, We are going to take part in the group and help with what we are able. This is our mature and committed stance to help to make the governance group a `listener` of the community first of all. At the proposed rates the community pool will be drained rapidly. Previous…

Excerpt (1198 of 2666 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗