Cosmos Labs Wants to Hear from You

Cosmos Labs is restructuring how we communicate with the community about the Cosmos Hub roadmap, tokenomics, and other upcoming changes to the ecosystem.

In order to ensure we do that effectively, we’re looking to get feedback from on how we can improve and how you’d like to see us communicate with you moving forward. We’ve put together a brief survey with a few questions targeted at this.

Cosmos Hub Community Feedback: How Should CL Communicate?

Cosmos Labs is changing how we communicate with the Cosmos Hub community. Before we publish a new approach to how we will communicate publicly, we want a clear read from you on what's working, what's missing, and where you'd want to be...

Please take a few minutes and fill this out. It should take less than 5 mins to complete for most people, and your feedback would be extremely helpful in shaping how we handle roadmap comms from now on! The survey can be taken anonymously for those that wish to do so.

Thanks in advance to anyone who decides to fill this out

Very cool!

Don’t let haters get under your skin.

@RoboMcGobo, this is a fantastic and vital initiative. I will be starting the survey shortly, keeping a very broad and macro vision on what we truly need to attract capital and why.

To give you a practical example of what is at stake, we are seeing high-quality, grassroots innovation right now in the “Pegged USDC, PUSDC as a Stable Asset on Cosmos Hub” thread by @atomregistry. Even though @atomregistry and I might not have seen eye-to-eye on past matters—such as his stance on the Osmosis acquisition/rescue—we must objectively value the hard work and the great ideas flowing from him. I am actively participating in that very interesting thread, and we shouldn’t let this kind of innovation pass by unnoticed.

However, for projects like his to truly move the needle and attract Wall Street, they need to be backed by a Hub that fosters institutional-grade standards. We need clear Tokenomics, predictable roadmaps, and a rock-solid economic framework. The “details” are where big capital decides whether to enter or stay on the sidelines. Let’s make sure the Hub provides the solid foundation these builders need.

Thanks for the kind words and for highlighting the PUSDC thread — really appreciate the constructive feedback from the community. I believe my On-Chain Sites feature (live at On-Chain Sites | Atom Registry ) could well represent the biggest contribution I’ve made to Cosmos so far. It turns the Hub into a permanent, serverless home for websites using pure CosmWasm contract storage. Core idea & mechanics • Pay 5 ATOM once to store a self-contained HTML file (≤100 KB) on-chain forever. • Future edits cost only gas — no recurring fees, no hosting bills, no expiry. • Every version is timestamped and preserved on-chain. • Ownership is verified against your Atom Registry domain. • A lightweight browser extension lets users visit these domains directly from the chain (no DNS, no servers, no intermediaries). Expanded use cases & real utility Here are practical examples showing its power: • Permanent landing pages / personal sites — Your bio, portfolio, or project page lives forever on the Hub. • Decentralized project documentation — Whitepapers, roadmaps, or static tools that can’t be taken down. • Censorship-resistant publishing — Ideal for independent creators,…

Excerpt (1193 of 2997 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

@atomregistry , as one of the utilities for the Hub, I absolutely love the economic model of a 5 ATOM toll. But beyond the economics, this project highlights exactly what we must defend: Cosmos is one of the fastest and most secure networks in existence. The ability to store sensitive data instantly, knowing it is cryptographically sealed and that no one can access or delete it, is exactly why we remain number one and keep expanding our range of opportunities. We must keep opening new paths that leverage this speed and security. Looking at the technical constraints (≤100 KB), the institutional value lies entirely in “Compliance & legal proofs” and “Archival records” . Wall Street will pay a premium for unalterable, high-speed legal registration. You are building an unassailable digital notary, not a GoDaddy competitor. Focus your marketing on that specific, high-value institutional niche. Regarding the browser extension, my concern is the friction it creates. However, I understand that sometimes the most important thing is simply to get started. As you advance and update the system, this friction will likely disappear, evolving to serve an incalculable market of needs,…

Excerpt (1193 of 1506 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

I also have Search | Atom Registry for rendering. Since it’s easy to template, I should probably go ahead and build a standalone search site with a download link for the template. The 100KB is site imposed not contract since Cosmos allows 128K. I agree that its much bigger than websites and I’m working through full serverless DB pairing this with a custom programming language I spent most of 10 years writing.

Thanks!

@atomregistry , haha, it took some digging to get that out of you! You kept that well-guarded. You are an absolute machine, and honestly, I’m almost scared to keep poking around your project to see what else you have hidden. I actually figured as much regarding the 128KB limit, but I assumed you needed to leave a minimum KB buffer for the programming overhead or to prevent the contract from locking up when hitting the maximum cap. For every technical doubt or friction I throw at you, you have a more than extraordinary way out (that Serverless DB sounds massive!). I absolutely love having these kinds of conversations. Even if we might disagree on some things, it is clear you have thought this all through and are 10 steps ahead of me. As they do on Got Talent , I am giving you the “Golden Buzzer” —straight to the finals! The work you are doing here is superb. For my part, I will keep an eye on everything, but I see it very well structured and planned. I don’t see any cracks in this plan; all doubts and ideas were resolved in a flash. Thank you for all the information. I hope that besides being a bit of a nuisance asking so many questions (which hopefully helped others…

Excerpt (1192 of 1559 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

[DRAFT] Whitelist Atom Registry Deployment Address for Osmosis Interchain TLD, Registry, and ICS-721 Infrastructure Summary This proposal requests Osmosis governance approval to whitelist the Atom Registry Osmosis deployment address for scoped...

@atomregistry Another ace up your sleeve? How many do you have left? I see you are chaining one move to the next, and it all makes perfect sense. I just read your Osmosis proposal draft… Reserving the `.osmo` and `.osmosis` namespaces right out of the gate is a masterstroke. Setting up your storefront in the liquidity heart of Cosmos while keeping the core infrastructure anchored to the Hub is a brilliant move. But the PUSDC (USDC-backed NFTs) infrastructure was the real plot twist. You aren’t just building a Web3 DNS; you are laying down the pipes for an entire interchain asset routing system. Leveraging ICS-721 for this is exactly the kind of cross-pollination this ecosystem needs—a direct bridge to bring that massive Osmosis user base and volume right into our infrastructure. The best part? Keeping the reserve custody and final redemption strictly anchored to the Cosmos Hub. You leverage Osmosis for its massive user base, but the Hub remains the ultimate vault, capturing the value and burning the ATOM gas. As long as this expansion keeps driving value, utility, and ATOM gas usage back to the Hub as you promised, I’m 100% on board with the conquest. You definitely have…

Excerpt (1197 of 1263 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗