[DRAFT] Atom Registry — Official Web3 Universal Namespace Platform for Cosmos Hub
Change log • 2026-03-28 Created initial post Summary Atom Registry is a fully deployed, self-funded Web3 domain naming platform live on Cosmos Hub mainnet today. This signaling proposal asks the community to formally recognize it as the official multi-TLD Web3 namespace and domain naming layer for Cosmos Hub . No community pool funds are requested. Eight CosmWasm contracts are already running on cosmoshub-4. This proposal costs the Hub nothing except an endorsement. In exchange: full open-source publication, 2-of-3 multisig community governance, 50% of platform earnings to a Cosmos LP for one year, and unconditional transfer of 16 TLDs to major ecosystem teams — including `.cosmos` and `.ibc` to the Interchain Foundation and `.dao` to the Cosmos Hub community pool as a permanent revenue-generating asset. Details The Problem Cosmos Hub has no official naming layer. ENS on Ethereum. SNS on Solana. Unstoppable Domains on Polygon. Every major L1 has one. Cosmos Hub does not. Users send to 45-character addresses. Projects have unverifiable identities. Validators compete on marketing copy. This is a solved problem — it is already solved. Live Namespace Snapshot…
Excerpt (1199 of 9576 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗
Pretty cool I must say, I really like the UI , very smooth and clean. Was about to register my name but like someone els said it doesn’t work atm with Ledger.
Is it something you plan to add ?
I know nothing about domain and hosting a website so I’m waiting on other to comment on that part.
For now, I would say this is an interesting proposal I want to support
Hi There!
I’m working on Leap and Ledger both! My goal is to trigger a popup if Kepler isn’t detected for Leap and Ledger. I have a bridge built but to be fully transparent, it’s glitchy so I can’t put it into production.
I’m on it, though!
Thanks!
Amazing work and respect for the effort but I don’t think this proposal passes in its current form. For something seeking official cosmos hub recognition, the key trust and security pieces should be in place before the vote, not after it. Open source code, an independent audit and clearer governance guarantees should come first. Right now it feels like the community is being asked to endorse first and verify later and for infrastructure of this importance, that order matters 
That’s a valid point. I would think that an equally valid point is that this is the easiest project ever to verify simply by registering a TLD, then subdomain, then launch an HTML website, and it all functions clearly as I claim, or I’ve just been blowing smoke. For that testing flow, I’ll be more than happy to fund a clean account of the communities choosing. If I’ve actually built a legitimate decentralized web experience as I claim, that can be determined in just a few minutes. If I haven’t then the proposal is dead anyway. As far as open sourcing the project, if the proposal does go into formal submission, I’ll open it up for review. All the data is either onchain already or in a static HTML website so it’s not secret anyway. I would agree that the governance should be clear and if there is something I’ve overlooked, or needs to be negotiated, I’m available for that conversation. The Draft covers an independent audit and since the existing contracts would in part need updated for migration, it would make sense to audit the updated contracts instead of the existing ones since there will be treasury and governance items to address. I appreciate your feedback and hope I can…
Excerpt (1199 of 1228 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗