Value Preserving License vs perpetual $whine
a nice lil $whine about forum config First of all I would like to note that I absolutely could have just used the earlier thread located here Value preserving license for community funded work Signaling/Text Earlier today I was having a conversation about funding the work of informal and hypha. I am broadly but not unconditionally supportive of this move. Both informal and hypha have done great things for the hub and I’ll just give a couple of examples: informal ICS hypha white glove service for consumer chain onboarding Additionally, both teams have been helpful to Notional in security research. I have some questions, too: funding split between orgs Current team sizes Metrics …but I’m… But in order to prevent posts being necroed, posts magically close after 14 days on this here forum, despite the fact that conversations here have years long time lines. I would like to ask @zaki_iqlusion from sommelier how he’s feeling about this vintage and if there should be an appropriate matching shit coin. value Preserving License I believe that the hub is faced with a real shit or get off the pot moment. Currently, really really valuable…
Excerpt (1192 of 4994 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗
I do want to add, if ethos goes and uses this work, under our perfectly normal, credentialed apache 2.0 license that needs no legal review, that is totally fine.
Instead of softly complaining about this situation, I suggest that we create efficient, mutually beneficial licensing terms that will grow the ICS user base and encourage its further refinement.
x.comJacob BIP🐱420 Gadikian 🐳⚛️⚗️ (@gadikian) on X
By the way I’m aware that my first post is a little bit of a discombobulated rant. I plan to collect feedback here, and attempt to write a governance proposal that brings Gaia revenue over the next week.
REVENUE FOR THE HUB IS GOOD
(Isn’t this obvious!?)
STREAMLINED PRODUCER CHAIN ONBOARDING AND SOFTWARE ADOPTION ARE GOOD
(isn’t this obvious?)