[ARCHIVE] Signaling proposal - Onboarding, managing, offboarding the AEZ

Change log • 2024-06-25 Final post and archive • 2024-04-18 Created initial post UPDATE Due to the move from Full set Security to partial set security and then ICS2 and permissionless on- and offboarding of consumer chains ( CHIPs Discussion phase: Permissionless ICS ), we consider the original proposal to have lost part of its purpose. We still think that some of the steps developped here have an added value: Particularly we think that consumer chains wanting to join the ICS should stick to the principles guiding the AEZ and should from themselves produce clear and transparent information layed out in the steps detailled below: What is the chain proposing, what are they bringing to AEZ? How do they imagine conflict resolution to work to prevent worst case scenarios of being kicked out of the AEZ? We think incumbent chains should present these information before making the step to ask for a Chain ID. Summary This signaling proposal has two objectives: • Accelerate the discussion on a standard workflow in the AEZ. • If the different pieces of the proposed workflow find large support: Kickoff the creation of such standard workflow. The proposed steps are…

Excerpt (1198 of 13267 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

Does partial set security change any of the phases / workflows outlined here?

QUESTIONS: • Is this signaling prop another Mission Publiques/RnDao initiative? If no, can you identify key principals that will be central to accelerating discussions and such? • In the event this signaling prop passes, how much in funding will your group be seeking? I’m assuming your services for advancing conversations on AEZ are not free. • If you are interested in seeking imminent funding, is your intention to apply for another AADAO grant, or will you be submitting a funding proposal on the hub? • Last year, you submitted a successful grant application to AADAO as operators of Mission Publiques/RnDao. However, your funding was discontinued by AADAO in Q4 2023. What were the reason/s AADAO cited for discontinuation? • You shared the Citizens Assembly final report on the Forum and Cosmonaut HQ Telegram . Your report had little to no engagement from the community. This being the case, how are you qualified to steward ongoing conversations given your team’s apparent challenges with community engagement? • Did you receive any feedback from AADAO re Citizens Assemblies final report in private channels? If so, what was their assessment of the work your team…

Excerpt (1195 of 1353 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

Respectfully, I’m not reading all that.

Please provide a preview “tl:dr” summary at the beginning of it.
If it sounds interesting or valuable enough that I want to read the rest, congratulations.

If not, it’s probably a crap idea anyway, and then none of us need to waste our time.

Hello @Cosmos_Nanny , thanks for the questions. Here are some answers: • Is this signaling prop another Mission Publiques/RnDao initiative? If no, can you identify key principals that will be central to accelerating discussions and such? This is not a proposal from Missions Publiques/RnDAO. It is the product of the pilot of Citizens’ Assembly. In order to finish the process and land it, we asked the group if we should transform the final set of recommendations they came up with into a signaling proposal. The group of participants said yes, and this is why we publish this signaling proposal. In this case I would see Missions Publiques/RnDAO as stewards of the output of the Assembly. • In the event this signaling prop passes, how much in funding will your group be seeking? I’m assuming your services for advancing conversations on AEZ are not free. In the event it passes I don’t see a role for us. The further discussion on onboarding, managing, offboarding the AEZ would be up to the community and I see the role of the Assembly and our role as organizers of this assembly as concluded. A different question is: If the prop passes and there is a demand to support a…

Excerpt (1193 of 5114 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

TL;DR: This signaling proposal outlines a framework for integrating, managing, and potentially removing chains within the AEZ. It aims to establish standardized processes based on discussions and principles such as economic incentives, moral alignment, and technical compatibility. The onboarding process involves multiple phases including initial proposals, community discussions, technical and financial analyses, and culminates in an on-chain vote. Management involves monitoring economic, technical, and qualitative metrics to ensure chains align with AEZ goals. Offboarding, though not yet experienced, is considered for chains that outgrow or diverge from AEZ’s objectives. The proposal emphasizes clear communication and conflict resolution throughout.

Syed:

partial set security

My recording from the discussion of the group was that it doesn’t. I will circle back with the participants and let you know

Alright, so it’s something that could be done passively through some clever metrics and dashboards.

Thanks.