[ESSAY] Cosmos Hub: The First Democratic State of Capital
One member of our community has recently shared with us an essay regarding the Cosmos Hub’s particular position in the legal jurisdiction framework. We though this work was definitely worth being published to the whole ATOM community as it is describing an interesting vision which we could all learn from. Introduction: Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted that, in the face of the natural tendency of situations to threaten equality, it is essential for laws to work tirelessly towards its preservation. Historically, nations have experienced numerous revolutions, often motivated by the quest for equality and freedom - ideals now deeply ingrained in our collective understanding of the state. Blockchain technology constitutes a new field of study that would have captivated thinkers such as Rousseau, John Locke, or Montesquieu. It proposes new forms of governance, envisions a reorganization of state structures, and could lead to new ideological revolutions and the redefinition of boundaries. The aim of this study is to explore how democratic, political, and international principles can interact with these emerging technologies. This is to better understand the key issues posed by…
Excerpt (1194 of 21181 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗
I think that we must do more observation of the educated and non-educated cultures; even more after this pandemic.
Because I can feel and see a more increase of different behavioral patterns and thought process; maybe I’ve been just asleep and now noticing, Lol…
However,
I can agree that there must be a structure in place in order to create logic with in a system.
The issue at hand is how much power is one willing to endure.
Is his or her power brought by fairness
Is his or her power one sided
Is his or her power brought by greed
Is his or her power of lust
Is his or her power of hate
In my opinion it boils down to balance
But this balance comes with morals, ethics and authenticity.
One prevalent misconception in today’s power structures is the absence of accountability. This issue is largely tied to organizational challenges, leading to power holders trying to maintain their positions as if they have a legitimate claim to them. It’s crucial for everyone to recognize that power inherently involves accountability. The duration of power is contingent on it being granted. Making the revocation process easier is vital, in our view, to promote more dynamic governance participation and mitigate such tenacious grips on the system.
I would have to totally agree that accountability is extremely important instead of deflecting it to others.
But in order to expect this from everyone we would have to create a new breed, a new colony and apply a new teaching.
When you have different cultures and different belief systems, different environments that people grow up into, they carry certain behaviors that have been scripted into their DNA.
It will be pretty hard to change that Behavior pattern
That willpower will have to come directly from them
There’s a lot of influences out there
Social media being one of them BIG ON THE LIST
Environment
Foods
Karmic healing (Not wanting to do The shadow work)
I’m sure that that one might not sound believable but for me it holds true.
There’s a lot more that I can just share here but again accountability is definitely key.
Last thing
If we can tweak the thought process which is not infringing on free-will, we have something.
Two captivating research areas we’re monitoring closely as potential solutions to this issue are continuous and block voting. Continuous voting involves continuously tallying votes, enabling voters to modify their choices over time, and conducting regular sampling with a threshold to prompt adjustments to the elected committee. Block voting, meanwhile, allows for the election of multiple individuals for a single position. This encourages diverse modes and cooperation in a typically competitive environment, preventing ‘winner takes all’ scenarios that can lead to power concentration.
More ressources on the subject:
Cambridge CoreBloc Voting for Electoral Accountability | American Political Science Review...
Bloc Voting for Electoral Accountability
Medium – 31 May 19Conviction Voting
From ad-hoc voting to continuous voting.
Reading time: 7 min read
Sorry but unless the hub adopts a concept of property, and mechanisms for enforcing it, you are simply wrong. This is not a capitalist place. Capitalism is at least in part a belief in property rights. Now let’s keep in mind indeed we do have property rights over the software, however we have chosen to license that software in the most permissive way possible, which makes it certain that we cannot profit from the software that we create when it is used outside of this contacts, and that is the furthest thing from capitalism possible. Value Preserving License vs perpetual $whine Conversation a nice lil $whine about forum config First of all I would like to note that I absolutely could have just used the earlier thread located here https://forum.cosmos.network/t/value-preserving-license-for-community-funded-work/11572 But in order to prevent posts being necroed, posts magically close after 14 days on this here forum, despite the fact that conversations here have years long time lines. I would like to ask @zaki_iqlusion from sommelier how he’s feeling about this vintage and if ther… However, if we were to actually do capitalism sir I must tell you…
Excerpt (1197 of 1606 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗
Oh and by the way, if anybody is butt hurt in the end
I will laugh at you
x.com