Skip to content
Cosmopediaby Unity Nodes
DiscussionsTokenomicsStatistical Analysis of Prop#868 Rejection (Set Min Inflation to 0%)Forum ↗

Statistical Analysis of Prop#868 Rejection (Set Min Inflation to 0%)

Tokenomics1 posts410 views10 likesLast activity Jan 2024
GO
GovmosOP
Jan 2024 10

The governance has spoken, and numbers speak louder than words. Let’s delve into the statistics to underscore what the vote reveals. Source: Mintscan Validator Participation image 2776×944 248 KB This heatmap representation demonstrates that weighted participation, regarding vote power, is well-distributed across the spectrum. The orders of magnitude between larger and smaller validators are similar, showing no signs of particular influence in the validator set. image 1308×590 32.4 KB Vote distribution is 48.75% for, 23.13% against, along with 28,12% abstain. Compared to the number of involved validators, accounting for a share of 52.6% voting for, 29.77% against, and 16,03% abstain (these ratios are related to the 131 validators who voted). The relatively similar share confirms the previous assumption that the overall vote distribution is balanced across the participating validators. Accounts Participation image 1312×564 35.3 KB Something interesting emerges when we look at the voted accounts. Compared to validators, here we have a large majority of yes voters. But on the contrary, the weight-related votes account for similar distributions as the…

Excerpt (1193 of 3816 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

← Back to Discussions