Update prop 104 signatories

Note: this is in extreme draft from. I just:

https://twitter.com/gadikian/status/1730398889839398929?t=JGsewrCRVuPgVm22lxEMCA&s=19

Change log

• YYYY-MM-DD Created initial post

Summary

The signatories for prop 104 have largely left Notional, leaving only lit and I.

Details

I haven’t figured out the precise plan yet. But I think it makes a lot of sense to get this post on the forum.

Recipient

Amount

Forum post link

IPFS link

Governance votes

The following items summarize the voting options and what it means for this proposal:

YES -
NO -
NO WITH VETO - A ‘NoWithVeto’ vote indicates a proposal either (1) is deemed to be spam, i.e., irrelevant to Cosmos Hub, (2) disproportionately infringes on minority interests, or (3) violates or encourages violation of the rules of engagement as currently set out by Cosmos Hub governance. If the number of ‘NoWithVeto’ votes is greater than a third of total votes, the proposal is rejected and the deposits are burned.
ABSTAIN - You wish to contribute to quorum but you formally decline to vote either for or against the proposal.