A Strategic Investment plan for Cosmos

Several people have asked what I would do differently if I had a role on capital allocation in Cosmos. It’s worth considering all options for funding such a strategic investment plan. First and foremost, I would establish a program of bonuses and rewards for teams that can provide compelling arguments why they accomplished significant milestones on growth of IBC volume, ICS app-chain TVL or user adoption. Second, Cosmos should always have one ambitious go to market attempt per year designed to maintain and amplify relevance. The 2023 version of this is DyDx. There needs to be one for 2024. There is a large backlog ideas from Dogecoin on Cosmos, AI model governance and more. Cosmos should always have something that has a non linear growth potential on deck. Third, relevance. We need to rebalance unding away from maintenance of existing software artifacts and towards integrating Cosmos systems into other ecosystems. It’s sort of unreal how the Internet of Blockchains just means Comet, Comet light clients, Cosmos SDK and ICS. We need to be funding IBC implementations in modular chain stacks. • Support Comet based sequencers. • Implementing IBC for EVM rollup, and SVM…

Excerpt (1196 of 1525 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

Thanks @zaki_iqlusion for these insights. Is community pool in current format enough for this or do we need to think in direction of one time allocation/creation of bigger community pool or even smth else?

Commenting your points:1 and 3 is basic hygiene, while 2 is not just good to have but also kind of alpha thing that creates blue ocean. Also 2 could be main food for new cosmonauts exploring the ecosystem.

Maybe instead of lowering 20% yield we could just say fck it and put half of that in 2024 for this plan?

Having worked with many fantastic Cosmos builders, having seen Cosmos teams leading research on modularity, connecting disconnected, mastering SSF and IBC I am very much interested in the strategic initiatives on Cosmos.

Cosmos, Ethereum, Ethereum L2s can benefit from sharing (growing) liquidity, bridging assets and ideas.

Starknet - one of leading Ethereum rollups is planning to adopt Tendermint for its decentralization roadmap. Staking teams with experience from Cosmos ecosystem will be well seen in making Starknet infrastructure robust and well designed.
community[dot]starknet[dot]io/t/tendermint-for-starknet/98248

There are so many initiatives coming from Cosmos that we respect. There are so many inspiring builders in the ecosystems.

Connecting Cosmos, Ethereum, and Solana ecosystems might be the most exciting journey of the next few years. Bringing enterprise, research, builders spirit together. Never scrificing values, always open to influence and inspirations.

I don’t think ATOM should have to fund this entirely on our own.

I think we have allies in the wider blockchain ecosystem where we can create alignment and coalitions.

Send it. IBC everywhere

I think we need a venture capital that favors IBC ecosystem.
For example of Solana, Alameda Research played a role of an investor in several projects on Solana.

Thanks Zaki. Please keep these coming. Cheers

I don’t view the Cosmos Hub (ATOM) as a Google Moonshot factory. I think you basically view ATOM as a venture capital fund that keeps funding various moonshots in hope that one of them would strike it big. The cosmos technology allows you to create your own blockchain with your own token to do that. While I don’t agree with Jae hyper-minimalistic vision of the Cosmos Hub, I don’t view the Cosmos Hub as a VC fund either. For me the Cosmos Hub is a provider of services for Cosmos SDK chains that make sense and accrue value to ATOM token holders. In other words, I view expansion of Cosmos Hub functionalities as very limited and deliberate. At this stage, I see liquid staking as a valuable functionality to be provided (merge Stride into ATOM) and I see IBC-to-IBC spot token exchange as valuable (merge Osmosis into ATOM). Why? Staking yield is the primary financial product of Proof-of-Stake chains. Spot exchange - in other Cosmos investments I have seen needs for conversion from USDC to token and back. That conversion should be automated and cheap and for that to happen I need consolidated liquidity. Fragmented liquidity among many exchanges results in higher spreads and bad…

Excerpt (1192 of 2829 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

vixcontango: Staking yield is the primary financial product of Proof-of-Stake chains. Staking yield is not a product, it’s a cost. It’s the price of security, it’s the cost of running the chain. It either needs to be paid for via fees or via inflation / token depreciation. The Hub challenge is generating ROI from that inflation. ** Rather than paying for that staking yield by collecting fees from retail dApps the Hub needs to host consumer chains chosen to leverage AEZ atomic composability (Unique Value Proposition) towards an overarching catalog of complementary services. ** Totally agree with the infrastructure thoughts. Highways. Or picks & shovels works too. Liquidity as a service IMO is only good insofar as it spreads ATOM out across the Cosmos. It’s loss-leading marketing & adoption spending, not a core revenue generating business model. Security & Trust as a Service seems like the Hub’s fated niche. For broad & creative definitions of how to provide security & trust - the strategic leveraging of ICS/AEZ chains to design unique PMFs. The next wave of devs, b2b adopters, & retail wallet users could all see the Hub as a mark of trust & safety. Better than…

Excerpt (1197 of 1505 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

The value of Cosmos is Cosmos