[Proposal] Cosmos EcofuseAI - Empowering the Cosmos Ecosystem with AI-Powered automated Tools and Infrastructure

Cosmos EcofuseAI - Empowering the Cosmos Ecosystem with AI-Powered automated Tools and Infrastructure Banner (3) 1920×1021 138 KB Change Log • 2023-09-08 Created Initial Post Executive Summary EcofuseAI seeks 39k ATOM in total funding, with 34k ATOM dedicated to tools and infrastructure development as described and 5k ATOM for one year of management including hosting, devops etc. Our suite of AI-powered tools and infrastructure, designed to benefit the Cosmos Ecosystem, offers streamlined development, heightened community engagement, improved user experiences, and enhanced foundation operations. We request 30% upfront, 35% upon Milestone 1 completion, and 35% after Milestone 2. Why Support Us? EcofuseAI enhances the Cosmos Ecosystem, benefiting Cosmos at scale: • Streamlines development and innovation. • Fosters community engagement. • Improves user experience. • Elevates foundation operations. Funding Milestones • 30% upfront. • 35% upon Milestone 1 completion. • 35% after Milestone 2. Links • Vision (Problem Statement and Solution): https://youtu.be/s1AGqv5Vtjo • Cosmos Demo: https://cosmos.ecofuse.ai/ • Website:…

Excerpt (1178 of 15411 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗

cc @hub.tusz.mod : please give permission to add/attach links into our proposal.

Thanks

Better suited to go through AADAO. Interesting idea, but I think AADAO. Also, AI blockchains are very early & the usecases are set in stone how they draw revenue back to the L1. Best of luck!

Hello @boldpanther thank you for your detailed write-up. I post here as a representative of the ATOM Accelerator DAO (AADAO), a grant focused DAO owned by the Cosmos Hub and delivering grants in order to develop the Cosmos Hub and AEZ ecosystem.
I believe you would likely find a better fit with AADAO. Plus, we’re interested in AI tooling.
Only caveat: we just closed applications but we hope to reopen at the end of November following the possible renewal of our mandate.

Thank you, @Youssef, for your response and kind words. However, waiting until the end of November is not ideal as it will extend the implementation timeline.

Currently, we are well-positioned to execute on everything we have outlined in our application. Is there a possibility that we can begin executing and building these tools now, with the understanding that we will be compensated as per our request through AADAO when the next batch begins?

If we commence now, we will invest our own resources, time, and engineering efforts, expecting compensation as per our proposal through AADAO in the upcoming batch. This approach not only demonstrates our credibility but also allows us to complete the development of these tools by the end of January. Furthermore, by the end of November 2023, we will already have some of these tools ready at production level exclusively trained for cosmos.

If this is not feasible, we can draft a proposal to receive 25% of our requested funding from the community pool now, with the remainder allocated through AADAO in the subsequent batch.

Looking forward to your views. cc @Youssef @jacobgadikian

Thank you
EcofuseAI

hi

i’m reading “Cosmos ecosystem” at least 5 times in your post. then why Atom CP alone should give a grant?

some day we’re going to need to really focus on Atom chain/AEZ fundings. Atom has already funded enough “Cosmos ecosystem” tools for years.

to me even AADAO shouldn’t fund this. it should be ICF/IBP or a shared funding from diverse CPs.

edit: ho and please please no retroactive grants. that sucks 9/10 times.

Well ATOM is the name of native token of cosmos. Its called COSMOS only:)

I don’t know how to give explanation to your comment where your are just mocking the use of name COSMOS which is itself a correct form:))

sorry if you feel i’m mocking, i’m not.

i just don’t see how this funding could help Atom specifically, and in my view 39k Atom, potentially at least worth $500K in some months is way to high for the value your tools could bring.

i think i’m going to make a proposal for the Hub to stop giving grants from CP when the token price is at a 2 years long all time low.

I just wanted to say hello to Cyber and Bostrom in this case

Hey @boldpanther,

could you elaborate what the differences between your solution and using the OpenAI API (GPT-4, fine tuning, etc.) are and what advanatges there are? Or is your product basically an implementation of the API?