Draft: grace yu legal defense fund
This document is live, I am currently editing it: docs.google.com Grace Yu Legal Defense Proposal Grace Yu Legal Defense Proposal On 3/23/23, All in Bits, Inc., filed a legal complaint against Grace Yu in the Eastern District of NY. Civil Action No. 23-cv-02270 All in Bits, the company created to incubate and bring to market tendermint... Please note that any community member may choose to leave comments on the document. It is a work in progress, and your feedback is valued. Please additionally note, that the MsgFundCommunityPool referred to in the document, is this: twitter.com larry.stars @larry0x @RoboMcGobo @jhernandezb_ @shan3v @StargazeZone @JakeHartnell No, the way the community pool is designed, you can’t simply send funds to its address. You need to execute a MsgFundCommunityPool message You need someone on osmosis chain, such as a contract, to execute this upon receiving the funds from stargaze 3:18 PM - 10 Jan 2023 5 twitter.com Jacob Gadikian @gadikian @360bilalkhan @simon_warta @seppwurscht @Thyborg_ @mintscanio @osmosiszone and ol @cosmoshub…
Excerpt (1198 of 1444 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗
Prop is out, forum post is not even updated. Truth is nobody cares about politics inside the cosmos and it’s a total shitshow. After Turkey, ‘charity’, playing on pity, now this one. How far down the abyss are we going ? How on earth can you even put to vote a prop like this one after everything that happened ? Why aren’t you just offering people the choice with a fundraise instead of taking the community as hostage with all the influence that few people can have regarding other validators and jeopardizing the healthiness of the community and perhaps the future of the project ? If this passes many will leave the ship. This is just like running president in a country, you/we are not here to care about a single individual but the greater good of majority of cosmosnauts. If it is one of your close friend and you are trying anything to make it easier I could understand but it still looks terrible. If it only is politics than it’s equally bad. May the truth win, I won’t be doing anything else but voting NWV BTW @jacobgadikian I highly apprecite the work you are doing with your team, you often have a different vision/ideas that you know how to put into words &…
Excerpt (1193 of 1441 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗
I cannot be more disappointed with this proposal. Ever since we allowed a charity cause to slip through a lazy vote, the community pool seems to be drawing more and more “slush fund” grabbers. This proposal has zero to do with community health and attempt to elicit a “yes” vote by inferring there is some great threat lurking for ATOM.
DAOs are still just an experiment, and we are seeing how emotional manipulation can be used to pressure lay people with no real business experience to continue to let loose of community funds for things that are in no way beneficial to the community.
This will be the last straw for many. Unchecked validators will crash this project. Management had better step up.
NWV for me . it must not affect the hub and the community . fundraise maybe necessary but not by the community pool.
write a proposal to limit the validators voting power at first then no more issue will exist
They are starting to act like a government that can vote for their own pay raises and print money at will.
This proposal has been up on this forum for weeks, how is it you lot have just started making your feelings known when the prop is already posted. And there you go misusing NWV again. This is a yes for me…
Big sigh.
ATOM is NOT a meme coin, nor is it to be considered $$, especially to be spending community pool on 1-1 political issues.
NWV
NWV, I relegated from a “Yes” vote validator to a NWV or NO validator, even on other coins.
The proposal regarding funding Grace Yu’s legal defense contains multiple critical flaws and concerns. While the proposal regarding funding Grace Yu’s legal defense raises several concerns, it is important to examine it critically before deciding. There are several logical flaws within the content and proposal. Insufficient Evidence The proposal provides limited concrete evidence to support the claims about AiB’s practices, such as using unlawful non-compete agreements, severance agreements, and NDAs. Instead, it relies heavily on anecdotal reports and tweets. Equating the lawsuit with the suppression of reasonable criticism The proposal assumes that AiB’s lawsuit against Grace Yu suppresses reasonable criticism, infringing on her freedom of speech and expression. This assumption may not accurately represent the motivations or intentions behind the lawsuit, as it could potentially involve other complex legal factors or disputes. By equating the lawsuit with the suppression of reasonable criticism, the proposal might be oversimplifying the issue and framing it to elicit a stronger emotional response from the community. This portrayal could lead to a biased view of the…
Excerpt (1197 of 4838 characters). Read the whole post on the forum ↗
thank you – Notional enjoys a quality group of delegators
Are you a lawyer? If you are, in which state do you practise?